Authorial Intent vs. Reader-Response


Biblical Foundations » Authorial Intent vs. Reader-Response

Andreas Kostenberger just caused me to add his commentary on the Gospel of John to my CapCravings.

I don’t know about all of his hermeneutical positions, but I enjoyed his thoughts regarding the need to stay within the author’s intention when interpreting Scripture. I will be looking forward to his next posts on the subject. I have read him on 1 Timothy 2 and found him very helpful and convincing on the subject of women not teaching in the context of the local church.

In short, I don’t find it legitimate to assign symbolic meaning to a text, when the original author provides or suggests no such symbolic intention. Maybe when I finish Romans, John should be my next book to tackle. We will have some time to make this decision, I don’t think I’ll be out of the eighth chapter of Romans until 2008.

Information and Links

Join the fray by commenting, tracking what others have to say, or linking to it from your blog.


Other Posts
Health and Wealth Benny Hinn Style
Elton John’s Compassionate Religious Bias

Write a Comment

Take a moment to comment and tell us what you think. Some basic HTML is allowed for formatting.

Reader Comments

I heard Kostenberger a few years ago at ETS and he is very good.

The Baker Commentary Series is a really good collection. Certainly some better than others, but most are very solid contributions.

Big Chris

Chris, I agree. I’m reading Schreiner on Romans and have read Osborne on Revelation. I’ve enjoyed them both. I’ve read a few sections of Bock on Luke and found him very helpful. This series has actually become a must read in my regular preaching and teaching.